Legal Meaning Subversion

Notably, French experts in domestic influence and subversion colloquially use the noun “somnambule” (French: somnanbules) to designate “all the ordinary people who make up the masses”. The reason for choosing this pejorative name in a pejorative sense is that an overwhelming majority of “ordinary people” are unable to distinguish the difference between neutral and objective information (news) and propaganda intended to influence. From the point of view of specialists, the entire population behaves like millions of “sleepwalkers” ready to believe everything that the media, authors and influential agents tell and write indifferently. The reason for naivety is that people tend to believe that everything is officially published and disseminated by falsely attributing an official and unanimously recognized virtue to media such as print and audiovisual magazines, books, etc. Second, the greater the number of people who are actually or apparently involved in publishing/disseminating a fact or error, the more true this seems to be in the understanding of the masses. The higher the known number of people who have observed, heard or read the fact or error, the greater the probability that “it is really true”, still in the understanding of the masses. In addition, in France, the specialists of influence and counter-influence have the task of preventing the masses of people / “sleepwalkers” from “waking up” and understanding that they are in fact constantly deceived, and with what methods and tricks they are, since their own country also manufactures and spreads mistakes for them. In other words, the latter explanation would undoubtedly make effective and salutary the education of the masses in the methods and techniques of foreign influence, but at the same time it would reveal to them the influence and propaganda that their own government spreads and spreads for them. At the DGSE, a rule that colloquially alludes to this particular definition of sleepwalkers says: They sleep; don`t wake them up (“They [the masses] sleep, don`t wake them up”). Edgar Morin, French communist philosopher, sociologist, intelligence officer and founder of modern methods and techniques of influence and mass manipulation, is at the origin of this particular use of the word sleepwalker. Morin often said, “Awakened, they sleep,” quoting in his own way the Greek philosopher Heraclitus. Thus, Morin implied that the ordinary people who make up the masses are too stupid to distinguish between truth, influence, propaganda and disinformation. For the record, the exact and complete English translation of Morin`s quotation above reads as follows: “All men fall asleep, and all have the faith they dream of: for all things are as they appear to all, and all things flow like a river.” [28] [29] Middle English, Anglo-French, Late Latin subversion, subversio, Latin defining and understanding subverti subversion means identifying entities, structures, and things that can be undermined.

In addition, it can help identify practices and tools that are not subversive. Institutions and morality can be undermined, but ideology cannot be undermined. [14] The overthrow of a government or the creation of a new government as a result of an external war is not subversion. Espionage does not count as subversion because it is not an action that leads directly to the overthrow of a government. Information gathered by espionage can be used to plan and conduct subversive activities. [15] Subversion is literally the “reversal” of something. In the 1950s and 60s, many people were concerned about communist subversion of the U.S. government, although they often saw subversive activities where none existed.

Undemocratic governments often claim that anyone who disagrees with them or joins a protest is subversive. But subversion is not always such a serious matter; For example, when words like weekend, sandwich, work, and camping were used by the French, some of them began to claim that America was undermining their language. As mentioned above, Communist Party members were considered subversive by legislators, especially after the Russian Revolution. The House Un-American Activities Committee was founded in 1938 to investigate allegations of disloyalty and subversive activities by individuals, public employees, and organizations suspected of having communist ties. Senator Joseph McCarthy became the most visible public face of a time when Cold War tensions fueled fears of widespread communist subversion. The term “McCarthyism,” coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy`s practices, including public attacks on the character or patriotism of political opponents, was soon applied to similar anti-communist activities. Senator Pat McCarran supported the McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950 and the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, both of which were vigorously challenged in court, and Harry Truman, who went so far as to veto the former; However, the veto was overturned in the Senate by a vote of 57 to 10. The word is present in all languages of Latin origin and originally refers to events such as the military defeat of a city. Already in the 14th century it was used in the English language in relation to laws, and in the 15th century it was used in relation to the empire. The term has replaced “riot” as a term for illegal rebellion, although the connotations of the two words are very different; Rebellion that suggests open attacks on institutions, subversion something much more secretive, such as undermining the basis of belief in the status quo or inciting people against each other. Subversion – Roger Trinquier defined subversion as a term that could be summarized as modern warfare, “as interlocking political, economic, psychological and military systems of action aimed at overthrowing the established authority in a country”. [13] Other factors that do not specifically fall into these categories may also be useful for subversive dissidents.

In addition, many tools can also overlap with other tool groups. For example, subversives may infiltrate an organization more for cultural subversion than for control. Civil unrest can be used to provoke the government into a violent response. Thesaurus: All synonyms and antonyms of Subversion Corruption is one of the most common tools of subversion. Most societies view corruption as a form of corruption and it is used as a subversive tool because it “involves undermining existing rules of political or moral behavior.” [37] It may also be one of the least reliable tools. Corrupt officials are only useful when they act. However, the measures taken over time attract public suspicion. The public servant must be able to carefully conceal his or her actions or perform only key functions and actions. For these reasons, corrupt officials are most effective when asked to take immediate action. In the case of external subversion, corruption is usually used to influence rather than act. [38] Historically, MI5 has been given legal powers to investigate the national security threats posed by Subversion, but Subversion was not mentioned in the Security Service Act 1989, and according to MI5`s official website, Subversion is no longer being studied, due to a lesser threat resulting from the end of the Cold War and related political situations since the 1980s. [49] Recent authors, in the postmodern and poststructuralist traditions (including, in particular, feminist writers), have prescribed a very broad form of subversion.

It is not directly parliamentary government that they believe should be undermined, but dominant cultural forces such as patriarchy, individualism and scientism. This extension of the goal of subversion owes much to the ideas of Antonio Gramsci, who stressed that the communist revolution required the erosion of the particular form of “cultural hegemony” within society. [Page needed] To understand what is considered subversive, one must understand the intent of those who act. This makes the process of defining and identifying Subversion difficult. Laurence Beilenson stresses: “Criticizing a government for the sake of reform or changing its policies is not subversion, even if such criticism can contribute to overthrow. But criticism intended to aid a planned coup becomes subversive, whether good or bad. [16] Subversion (from the Latin subverti “overthrow”) refers to a process by which the values and principles of an existing system are contradicted or reversed in order to transform the established social order and its structures of power, authority, hierarchy and social norms.